Which Two Traits Are Common To The Essays “The Danger Of Lying In Bed” And “The Fallacy Of Success”

The essays “The Danger of Lying in Bed” and “The Fallacy of Success” share two common traits: a strong sense of morality and a clear message about the dangers of inaction.

Both essays take moral stances on important issues, arguing that failing to act in pursuit of one’s goals can be just as bad as actively doing harm. In “The Danger of Lying in Bed,” for example, Lewis argues that lying in bed is an example of inaction that perpetuates inequality and injustice. Similarly, in “The Fallacy of Success,” Russell points out that pursuing selfish goals alone will lead to unhappiness, while focusing too much on social causes can cause us to neglect our own needs.

Both essays also provide clear and effective messages about the dangers of inaction. Lewis does this by painting an evocative picture of a lazy, inert “man in bed” who is doing nothing to address the social problems that plague him. Russell accomplishes this through his witty and incisive analysis of various causes, ranging from socialism to spiritualism, which he ultimately concludes are not worth pursuing.

In summary, it is clear that both “The Danger of Lying in Bed” and “The Fallacy of Success” share two important traits: a strong sense of morality and a powerful message about the danger of inaction. Whether or not you agree with these essays’ arguments, they serve as potent reminders that inaction can be just as dangerous as active wrongdoing.